Key Senator announces opposition to merger

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070523/tc_nm/xm_sirius_dc_1;_ylt=Aj8X9txfNwyP9cWt.FqeSBkE1vAI

Reuters is reporting that Sen. Herb Kohl (D-WI) has come out on record as opposing the XM-Sirius merger.  As we’ve said before, Congress does NOT have a direct role to play in the merger decision, but that regulators who do have a role will take the input from those who control their funding very seriously.  Senator Kohl is the chairman of the Senate’s anti-trust subcommittee, and works closely with the DoJ anti-trust division.Senator Kohl

For Mel and the merger team, this is clearly bad news.  On the good news front the marketing department ought to take some of Sen. Kohl’s words for their advertising.  Terrestrial radio is too limited to compete with satellite radio, while personal audio players can not match the programming of satellite service, he wrote.

No other technology available today is a substitute for the satellite radio,” Kohl wrote.

Heck, we’ve been saying that for years!!  As much we all of us here would tend to agree with the Senator on these points, we also need to recognize that millions of consumers disagree and find their terrestrial radio stations and personal music players not only competitive, but superior.



Comments:

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by RoadRunner View Post
    <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070523/tc_nm/xm_sirius_dc_1;_ylt=Aj8X9txfNwyP9cWt.FqeSBkE1vAI"> http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070523/tc_nm/xm_sirius_dc_1;_ylt=Aj8X9txfNwyP9cWt.FqeSBkE1vAI</a>

    Rueters is reporting that Sen. Herb Kohl (D-WI) has come out on record as opposing the XM-Sirius merger. As we've said before, Congress does NOT have a direct role to play in the merger decision, but that regulators who do have a role will take the input from those who control their funding very seriously. Senator Kohl is the chairman of the Senate anti-trust committee, and works closely with the DoJ anti-trust division.

    For Mel and the merger team, this is clearly bad news. On the good news front the marketing department out to take some of Sen. Kohl's words for their advertising. <strong>Terrestrial radio is too limited</strong> to compete with satellite radio, while <strong>personal audio players can not match the programming</strong> of satellite service, he wrote.

    "<strong>No other technology available today is a substitute for the satellite radio</strong>," Kohl wrote.

    Heck, we've been saying that for years!! As much we all of us here would tend to agree with the Senator on these points, we also need to recognize that millions of consumers disagree and fing their terestrial radio stations and personal music players not only competitive, but superior.
    Cynical me here: I wonder if the good Senator has received any money recently from the NAB... Just wondering aloud..
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Satradioman View Post
    Cynical me here: I wonder if the good Senator has received any money recently from the NAB... Just wondering aloud..
    I had some of the same thoughts. But according to www.opensecrets.org, the Senator does not accept any money from PACs and almost exclusively self-financed his 2006 campaign. I also couldn't find any records of NAB contributions to the senator (although I welcome others to do more looking!)

    I don't want to stray into Asylum territory, but I'm not seeing any undue NAB influence here.

    Edit, here's a list of who got NAB money in the 2006 cycle. This does NOT include money contributed by the NAB's members. NAB Contributions
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by RoadRunner View Post
    while personal audio players can not match the programming of satellite service, he wrote.
    Ummmmm.... Any person, anywhere, can record an MP3 or a Podcast. There is infinitely more programming available to personal audio players than on Sirius' 130 channels.
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by ClubSteeler View Post
    Ummmmm.... Any person, anywhere, can record an MP3 or a Podcast. There is infinitely more programming available to personal audio players than on Sirius' 130 channels.
    True. I suspect the Senator's point (and again I'd agree with him) is that the quality of those programming choices is higher on satellite. Getting a variety of programming is also easier on satellite than iPod/mp3 players.
  5. But a monopoly will be good for us.
  6. As far as I can tell, Senator Kohl is not part of the decisionmaking body.
  7. Old people often have heart attacks.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by lronglien View Post
    As far as I can tell, Senator Kohl is not part of the decisionmaking body.
    No, he is not. But as the linked artice points out, "The deal is currently being reviewed by both the Justice Department and the FCC, which issued both satellite radio licenses in 1997 on the condition that the two companies would never merge.
    Although they can exert political influence over the agencies generally, lawmakers have no direct input into the decisions about individual merger reviews." The senator is the chairman of the subcomittee that reviews the activities of the DoJ anti-trust division. I don't think it's unfair to suggest that his opinion might hold some sway. YMMV.
  9. hahaah you guys are ridiculous "this guy has a point of view i disagree with, someone must be paying him!"
  10. from yahoo msg boards:

    Senator Kohl's financial motivations

    This fucking guy should recuse himself of anything to do with the Sirius-XM merger; here are the facts:

    Herb Kohl holds the title of President/Director of the Milwaukee Bucks. In 2005, the latest financial info I could gather on him, he has 68.7 million worth of stock in the company before expenses (http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2005/... So where's the connection? Well... here is an excerpt from an article you should read:
    The Milwaukee Bucks will assume full responsibility for advertising sales on their radio broadcasts and buy the air time for their games that run on WTMJ-AM (620) beginning with the 2007-2008 season.

    The Bucks and WTMJ management began informing their staffs and advertisers of the new arrangement Jan. 17 as part of a new broadcasting contract.

    http://www.bizjournals.com/milwaukee/sto...

    Currently Sirius is the provider for NBA, and if all XM subscribers went to Sirius, this would subtract greatly from the number of people who would listen to the games on WTMJ and cut into fat cat Kohl's pockets. This merger obviously should be approved, but I fear all the politcal games being played right now might stop it and if that happens I would lose what little faith I have left in our politicians.
  11. wow that's a pretty long stretch of logic. why would those XM people go pay extra for the NBA (sirius content is supposed to be tiered with the merger) with the new merger when those people can listen to the EXACT same broadcast on free radio?

    and wouldn't those NBA fans who for some reason REALLY want to listen to Bucks games on satellite (the exact same broadcast) already be sirius subscribers?
  12. Sen Kohl does not need NAB money.

    Sen Kohl started Kohls food and department stores in Milwaukee. He sold both for tons of money. And unlike most senators, Kohl still lives like an average person.

    I generally believe Kohl's opinion and agree that the merger is probably a bad idea.

    As far as conflict of interest. Thats not even logical.
    1. Anyone who really want to listen to the Buck on satellites is Sirius Subscriber for Basket Ball or some other reason.
    2. Almost anyone in Wisconsin can hear WTMJ especially at night (50,000w clear channel - i believe. Largest AM radio station in Wisconsin).
    3. Right not at least the Bucks suck!

    LDGumby
  13. it's absolutely ridiculous logic the more i think about it. sports on sattelite has commercials too, why wouldn't they just do ads with sirius/xm the year the merger becomes available, which probably won't be until 2 years from now anyway.

    are people really this desperate for a connection? if so, think on this: there are seven letters in Herbert Kohl's first name.
    there are four letters in Kohl's last name.
    if you go to channel 74 on sirius, its what? the BLUES... what's channel 74 on XM? THE BLUES!!!! this merger gives fat cat senator kohl the BLUES.

    that's evidence one, here's evidence two.

    the fat cat senator who opposes sirius is named Kohl....89.3 KOHL is a college radio station at Ohlone College.... they're a college station so i'm not sure if they're a member of the NAB but they teach a class called "RADIO BROADCASTING" and from all accounts they only focus THREE WEEKS of the semester to Satellite radio!!
    Bias? you decide.
  14. I think the Bush admin will disregard Senator Kohl and go ahead with the merger.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by SuperH View Post
    Old people often have heart attacks.
    What kind of heartless comment is this?
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by jreuschl View Post
    What kind of heartless comment is this?

    its not heartless... I mean a heart is kind of a pre-requisite for a heart attack.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by ClubSteeler View Post
    Ummmmm.... Any person, anywhere, can record an MP3 or a Podcast. There is infinitely more programming available to personal audio players than on Sirius' 130 channels.
    Can you give me the website I can get live podcasts of MLB games???

    The merger is a bad idea, well unless you have millions of shares of stock.
  18. I guess he doesn't know about a little start up called Slacker Radio:
    http://www.slacker.com/
  19. stick with you sat radio.
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by tgajr View Post
    stick with you sat radio.
    I have every intention of doing so.I just threw that out there to show there would be no monopoly if XM/Sirius merge.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by chadmd View Post
    Can you give me the website I can get live podcasts of MLB games???

    The merger is a bad idea, well unless you have millions of shares of stock.

    Ummm.....Like this?
    http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/subscriptions/gameday_audio.jsp
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by MrBroncosfan View Post
    That site looks like live internet broadcasts, not live podcasts.
  23. ok, a podcast is typically pre-recorded to be played later for later playback on an MP3 player. Thus the term podcast: pod = ipod, the most popular mp3 player cast = short for broadcast

    How does a "live podcast" differ from a "live Internet broadcast?"
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by chadmd View Post
    Can you give me the website I can get live podcasts of MLB games???

    The merger is a bad idea, well unless you have millions of shares of stock.

    Maybe not podcasts, but certainly streaming audio of the games at www.MLB.com
  25. Quote:
    Originally Posted by k9feces View Post
    But a monopoly will be good for us.
    Did you fail Macroeconomics?
  26. Quote:
    Originally Posted by eggbert52 View Post
    Did you fail Macroeconomics?
    I know NOTHING about big business but even I know better than that.
  27. I see Chapter 11 in the future either way the merger goes. Merging will just delay the inevitable. That is about the only positive besides having all sports and talk in one place eventually. I'm sure new equipment would be required to take advantage of both.

    The negatives greatly outweigh the positives on this one. Not a single positive is more important then making sure there is a direct competitor to keep the monthly fees in check.

    my two cents,
    scooby
(27) comments | Add your comments