Beth serious about the Bulldog that mauled the 4 y/o kid??

robdam · 05-09-2006, 04:24 PM

Please someone tell me she wasn't serious about saving the bulldog that mauled the poor 4 year old kid. Spoken like a true non-parent. It was the only part of today's show that I've heard so far. The other's, (except for Howie), on the show pussyfooted their way around the subject but I sensed that they were like, "Save the dog? Are you nuts???"

http://wcbstv.com/topstories/local_story_124133546.html

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/lo...tory?track=rss

TIJUANA1 · 05-09-2006, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robdam

Please someone tell me she wasn't serious about saving the bulldog that mauled the poor 4 year old kid. Spoken like a true non-parent. It was the only part of today's show that I've heard so far. The other's, (except for Howie), on the show pussyfooted their way around the subject but I sensed that they were like, "Save the dog? Are you nuts???"

http://wcbstv.com/topstories/local_story_124133546.html

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/lo...tory?track=rss

Sure she is. She works for animal shelters. They do these sort of things.

robdam · 05-09-2006, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TIJUANA1

Quote:

Originally Posted by robdam

Please someone tell me she wasn't serious about saving the bulldog that mauled the poor 4 year old kid. Spoken like a true non-parent. It was the only part of today's show that I've heard so far. The other's, (except for Howie), on the show pussyfooted their way around the subject but I sensed that they were like, "Save the dog? Are you nuts???"

http://wcbstv.com/topstories/local_story_124133546.html

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/lo...tory?track=rss

Sure she is. She works for animal shelters. They do these sort of things.

They rescue dogs that maul little kids? I bet she wouldn't feel the same way if she had her own kids - the selfish cunt.

oren · 05-09-2006, 04:35 PM

No. The way I understood the story, there were two rottweilers involved with the maulings and they believe the bulldog was incorrectly implicated and considered guilty by association because it was there when the incident occurred.

They didn't have the details as to who saw what, or if anyone testified seeing the 1-year old bulldog actually do anything other than barking when the incident occurred.

Oren

robdam · 05-09-2006, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oren

No. The way I understood the story, there were two rottweilers involved with the maulings and they believe the bulldog was incorrectly implicated and considered guilty by association because it was there when the incident occurred.

They didn't have the details as to who saw what, or if anyone testified seeing the 1-year old bulldog actually do anything other than barking when the incident occurred.

Oren

The way you understood the story from who - Beth O??? Was she there? What did the victims say? One would like to think that if the bulldog was not involved in the mauling, the victim(s) or witnesses would say so. Sounds like BS. Fry the dog.

oren · 05-09-2006, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robdam

The way you understood the story from who - Beth O??? Was she there? What did the victims say? One would like to think that if the bulldog was not involved in the mauling, the victim(s) or witnesses would say so. Sounds like BS. Fry the dog.

Yes, from Beth and her friend who is also concerned about this. I am not sure what the witnesses involved said other than reporting problems with the rottweilers. I haven't read anything that said the bulldog was actually mauling the kid.

I got the feeling that since the bulldog was present, the owner is just giving it up to be euthanized to avoid ongoing legal proceedings, etc. (this is Beth's and her friends concern).

Oren

TIJUANA1 · 05-09-2006, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robdam

Quote:

Originally Posted by TIJUANA1

Quote:

Originally Posted by robdam

Please someone tell me she wasn't serious about saving the bulldog that mauled the poor 4 year old kid. Spoken like a true non-parent. It was the only part of today's show that I've heard so far. The other's, (except for Howie), on the show pussyfooted their way around the subject but I sensed that they were like, "Save the dog? Are you nuts???"

http://wcbstv.com/topstories/local_story_124133546.html

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/lo...tory?track=rss

Sure she is. She works for animal shelters. They do these sort of things.

They rescue dogs that maul little kids? I bet she wouldn't feel the same way if she had her own kids - the selfish cunt.

LOL. Dude...calm down...Artie hates dogs too. Just Kidding. I agree with you on putting dangerous animals down. I didnt listen to the story, so I don't know the details, but I agree with you so far.

robdam · 05-09-2006, 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TIJUANA1

Quote:

Originally Posted by robdam

Quote:

Originally Posted by TIJUANA1

Quote:

Originally Posted by robdam

Please someone tell me she wasn't serious about saving the bulldog that mauled the poor 4 year old kid. Spoken like a true non-parent. It was the only part of today's show that I've heard so far. The other's, (except for Howie), on the show pussyfooted their way around the subject but I sensed that they were like, "Save the dog? Are you nuts???"

http://wcbstv.com/topstories/local_story_124133546.html

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/lo...tory?track=rss

Sure she is. She works for animal shelters. They do these sort of things.

They rescue dogs that maul little kids? I bet she wouldn't feel the same way if she had her own kids - the selfish cunt.

LOL. Dude...calm down...Artie hates dogs too. Just Kidding. I agree with you on putting dangerous animals down. I didnt listen to the story, so I don't know the details, but I agree with you so far.

LOL, sorry. I put myself in the parents shoes and I go crazy. Can you imagine if it were your kid and this rich bitch girlfriend, (who has no idea what it means to have harm done to your child), of H.S. comes along and say's in her baby voice, "please don't kill this poor little mauling dog"????

AmuN · 05-09-2006, 05:29 PM

if you read the 2nd link you posted you will see that the victims here only mentioned the rottweilers attacking the boy, not once did they mention the bulldog attacking or mauling.

Beth is concerned because the news stories coming out all say the rottweilers attacked. She feels the bulldog is being lumped into the punishment just because it was owned by the same person. i can see her concern over this if all she is hearing in all the reports is about the rottweilers. Even the familys comments in the stories point to the bulldog being an innocent bystander.

oren · 05-09-2006, 06:08 PM

I think Beth would agree that the bulldog needed to be put down if it attacked a child. Again, the concern is that the dog is going to be killed because it just happened to be there when the rottweilers were mauling the kid and because the owner feels that it would be in his best legal interest to do so.

I think it's too late for anyone to do anything about the bulldog anyway. I think it's been euthanized already.

Oren

craigiecubsfan · 05-09-2006, 09:07 PM

beth o is a retard. same for all those animal lovers. penn and teller had a great show about these nuts last night.

soxnationonline · 05-09-2006, 09:31 PM

typical hot broad without any sense of reality.

Bud · 05-10-2006, 07:27 AM

Why is there so much concern for a dog? Because it's an English Bulldog?

It's a friggin' dog.

Just put it down humanely.

robdam · 05-10-2006, 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bud

Why is there so much concern for a dog? Because it's an English Bulldog?

It's a friggin' dog.

Just put it down humanly.

Word

deadhead13 · 05-10-2006, 08:25 AM

What the hell is the matter with that bitch? She should get throuwn into a cage with a pissed off pitbull, and lets see how she feels about the thing after that.